多专业协同育人模式研究与实践——以长江大学土建类专业为例
作者:
作者单位:

长江大学 城市建设学院,湖北 荆州 434023

作者简介:

肖桃李(1978—),男,长江大学城市建设学院教授,博士,主要从事土木工程研究,(E-mail)200536@yangtzeu.edu.cn;

通讯作者:

折海成(1986—),男,长江大学城市建设学院副教授,博士,主要从事土木工程研究,(E-mail)shehaicheng@126.com。

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:

长江大学教学研究重点项目(JY2020018);湖北省高等学校省级教学研究项目(2022255)


Research and practice of multi-professional collaborative education model: taking the civil engineering specialty of Yangtze University as an example
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Urban Construction, Yangtze University, Jingzhou434023, P.R.China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着土建行业的转型升级,专业融合与渗透更加显著。以长江大学土建类专业为例,开展多专业协同育人实践。首先,从课程思政、专业思政和多专业协同思政等角度出发,分析土建人才培养的内在逻辑,并结合专业课程、专业特点、学生认知规律,制定多专业协同育人实施路径;其次,通过分析行业对人才的需求,构建土建类多专业协同育人的价值指标,形成思政引领下的多专业价值链;最后,以课程思政为切入点,专业思政为着力点,多专业协同思政为目标点,构建土建专业“一体两翼”人才培养模式。该研究成果在长江大学土木类、建筑类专业推广应用,产生了良好的育人效果,对同类高校具有借鉴意义。

    Abstract:

    With the transformation and upgrading of the civil engineering industry, the integration and penetration of specialties are more significant. Taking the major of civil engineering at Yangtze University as an example, a multi-professional collaborative education practice is carried out. Firstly, the internal logic of civil engineering talent training is analyzed from the aspects of curriculum ideological and political education, professional ideological and political education, and multi-professional collaborative ideological and political education. In combination with professional courses, professional characteristics, and cognitive rules of students, a multi-professional collaborative education path is proposed. Secondly, the value index of multi-disciplinary collaborative education in civil engineering is constructed by analyzing the industry’s demand for talents, and a multi-professional ideological and political value chain led by ideological and political education is formed. Finally, taking curriculum ideological and political education as a starting point, professional ideological and political education as a focus, and multi-professional collaborative ideological and political education as the goal, the talent training mode of one body and two wings of civil engineering is constructed. The research results have been popularized and applied in the civil engineering and architecture major of Yangtze University, and have achieved good educational effects, which can be used for reference by peers.

    参考文献
    [1] 王薇,易亮,蒋琦玮,等.专业课课程思政的思考及实践——以土木工程专业为例[J].新东方,2022(1): 83-88.
    [2] 于贺,鲁丽华.土木工程专业课程思政的实践路径研究[J].中国多媒体与网络教学学报(上旬刊),2020(4):60-61.
    [3] 夏嵩,王艺霖,肖平,等.土木工程专业教育中工程伦理因素的融入——“课程思政”的新形式[J].高等工程教育研究,2020(1):172-176.
    [4] 张天航,张鹏,郑元勋,等.高校土木工程类专业课程思政的实践与探索[J].高教学刊, 2020,6(19):172-174.
    [5] 钱凯,李治.土建类高校产学研联合的实践教学模式研究——以桂林理工大学土木与建筑工程学院为例[J].教育教学论坛,2022(23):157-160.
    [6] 刘军强,闫莉,王洪喜,等.“兵工精神”引领下的专业思政教育模式探索——以西安工业大学机械类专业人才培养为例[J].高教学刊,2022,8(19):146-149.
    [7] 杨飒.多模式融合的专业协同育人平台研究与实践[J].高教学刊,2018,4(2):54-56.
    [8] 路涵旭.课程思政视域下专业教师与思政教师协同育人路径研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2020.
    [9] 韩宪洲.深化“课程思政”建设需要着力把握的几个关键问题[J].北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,17(2):1-6,15.
    [10] 李春旺,范宝祥,田沛哲.“专业思政”的内涵、体系构建与实践[J].北京联合大学学报,2019,33(4):1-6.
    [11] 折海成,肖桃李.思政引领下的多专业协同育人模式探讨[J].榆林学院学报,2022,32(6):79-83.
    [12] 张凤翠,邬志辉.“三全育人”视域下高校课程思政建设研究[J].社会科学战线,2022(4):265-270.
    [13] 田林,寇越,费迎红.疫情期间土木工程专业线上教学运行模式研究[J].山西建筑,2020,46(6):172-173.
    [14] 肖桃李,杜国锋,赵航,等.基于工程教育认证的土木工程专业课程体系的改革与实践[J].高教学刊,2018,4(20):19-22.
    [15] 葛文璇,汤天培,沈强儒,等.土建类专业实践教学体系研究与实践[J].山西建筑,2020,46(21):171-173.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

肖桃李,折海成,丰燕,朱国庆,黄向阳.多专业协同育人模式研究与实践——以长江大学土建类专业为例[J].高等建筑教育,2024,33(6):50-57.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:232
  • 下载次数: 132
  • HTML阅读次数: 66
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2023-07-23
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-16
文章二维码