With the increasing enrollment in the Master of Engineering Management (MEM) program, strengthening quality monitoring in cultivation has become essential, and theses serve as a key indicator of this quality. Based on the thesis evaluation criteria of University M, this study identifies four primary analytical nodes: topic selection, literature review, thesis level, and thesis standardization. Four researchers conducts a cross-coding textual analysis of the problems and suggestions raised in expert blind review comments using Nvivo 12.0. This process identifies 14 secondary nodes and 50 tertiary node issues. Among the primary nodes, thesis level and thesis standardization exhibit relatively higher proportions of problems. Secondary nodes with significant issues includes research topic selection, research findings and frontier dynamics, research object, problems and solutions, theoretical methods and technical choices, workload and research depth, result applicability, structure and logic, writing expression, and writing standards. Specific manifestations of issues at the tertiary node level are enumerated. Based on these findings, suggestions for enhancing thesis quality monitoring are proposed.