工程图学课程思政元素挖掘与教学实践
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华北水利水电大学,土木与交通学院,河南 郑州 450045;2.华北水利水电大学,教务处,河南 郑州 450045

作者简介:

何大治(1977—),男,华北水利水电大学土木与交通学院副教授,博士,主要从事土木工程计算机仿真、工程图学应用研究,(E-mail) hdz@ncwu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G643.1

基金项目:

2020年度国家级一流本科课程;2020年度华北水利水电大学课程思政示范课程;2021年度华北水利水电大学高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目;新工科土木类专业学术型人才培养创新实践平台建设探索与实践(2024SJGLX0333)


Excavation and practice of ideological and political elements in introduction of engineering graphics
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, P. R. China;2.Academic Affairs Office, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    课程思政是新时期高等教育“三全育人”的关键途径,但工科专业课程因知识属性特点,面临思政元素挖掘难、教学融入难、评价标准确定难等问题,制约了课程思政教学工作开展。文章以工科专业基础课工程图学为研究对象,围绕其全过程思政教学框架构建展开探索,从思政元素挖掘、教学实践改革和教学效果评价三个方面提供了具体构建方法与实际案例。在思政元素挖掘方面,通过三条路径推进:一是从课程总体发展历史中提炼有价值的思政教育元素;二是结合课程知识点的溯源与应用背景,挖掘其中蕴含的世界观和方法论;三是从课程发展与创新视角,在实际案例中发掘思政教育内涵。教学实践环节聚焦课堂教学与教学评价两大核心,依据思政元素特点分章节设计教学路径,将思政元素融入课堂内外教学全过程;加强教材补充资料建设,将思政教学内容与方法纳入其中,弥补教材思政元素不足的短板;采用以学生参与度为核心的评价策略,将参与情况和积极性作为主要评价指标,降低教师评价难度,提升学生参与积极性,构建全过程、全方位的评价体系。工程图学作为工科具有代表性的专业课程,其课程思政实践所提出的思政元素挖掘路径与教学实践方法,能够为工科其他专业课程的思政教学提供参考,为解决专业课程教师在思政教学过程中面临的难题提供思路。

    Abstract:

    Curriculum-based ideological and political education is an important way to advance all-round education practice involving all staff in the whole-process in the new era. However, due to the characteristics of the knowledge attributes of engineering courses, there are difficulties in excavating elements, integrating the teaching process, and determining evaluation criteria. All those difficulties led to the unsmooth development of the ideological and political teaching of the courses. Based on how to build the ideological and political teaching framework in the whole process of a course—engineering graphics, in the paper, we show the construction methods and actual cases from the excavation of ideological and political elements to the reform of the course teaching practice, as well as the evaluation of teaching effect. The ideological and political elements can be excavated in three ways: the first is to excavate valuable ideological and political education elements from the overall development history of the course. The second is to analyze the traceability and application background of curriculum knowledge points, and find the world outlook and methodology embedded in them. The last way is to find the ideological and political education connotation in actual cases from the perspective of curriculum development and innovation. The teaching practice links focus on two core aspects: classroom teaching and teaching evaluation. The teaching methods are designed in chapters according to the characteristics of ideological and political elements. The elements are integrated into the teaching process links inside and outside the classroom. Investing more energy in the construction of supplementary materials, and putting the elements and methods of ideological and political education into them, will make up for the lack of ideological and political elements in the textbooks. The evaluation strategy based on students’ participation is adopted, and the main criteria for evaluation are whether students participate and how enthusiastic they are to participate. The difficulty of evaluation for teachers is reduced, and students’ enthusiasm is improved. The ideological and political element excavation paths and teaching practice methods proposed in the curriculum-based ideological and political education practice of engineering graphics can provide references for the ideological and political teaching of other professional courses in engineering disciplines, and offer ideas for solving the difficulties faced by professional course teachers in the process of ideological and political teaching.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

何大治,张修宇,王清云.工程图学课程思政元素挖掘与教学实践[J].高等建筑教育,2025,34(5):184-191.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2022-11-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码