同济大学与米兰理工大学在土木工程专业教学模式上的比较研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 200092;2.无锡市城市投资发展有限公司,江苏 无锡 214002

作者简介:

余江滔,教授,主要从事混凝土框架的抗火分析、地震损伤模拟与损伤机理分析研究,(E-mail)yujiangtao@tongji.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G640

基金项目:

同济大学智慧课程建设项目“基于本研贯通的防灾工程学“知识+能力”图谱建设”(2024KCTP04)


Comparison of teaching models of civil engineering major between Tongji University and Politecnico di Milano
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P.R.China;2.Wuxi Urban Investment and Development Co., Ltd., Wuxi 214002, P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土木工程教学不仅要为学生奠定专业基础,而且要通过实践教学培养其解决实际工程问题的能力。对比分析了同济大学和米兰理工大学在土木工程教育规模与理念、课程设置与教学改革、国际教学合作与交流项目三个方面的差异。结果显示,这两所学校都拥有完善的工程教育体系,都采用创新的教学方法提升学生的能力,在国际化方面取得了瞩目的成绩。然而,这两所学校在土木工程专业教学培养模式上的侧重点不同。同济大学的课程设置注重理论知识的系统性与全面性,鼓励跨学科学习,培养宽口径人才,米兰理工大学则更注重理论与实践的结合,并提供多样化的人才培养方向,以培养适应企业需求的工程师。结合两校在课程体系、教学方法上的不同,提出了工程教育改革的建议,以期为培养具有国际视野、创新能力和实践技能的复合型土木工程人才提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Civil engineering teaching should not only provide students with a professional foundation, but also cultivate students’ abilities to solve practical engineering problems. This study conducts a comparison and analysis between Tongji University and Politecnico di Milano on school scale and concept, curriculum setting and education reform, as well as international teaching cooperation and exchange. It is found that both universities have a complete engineering teaching system and are committed to improving students’ abilities through innovative teaching methods, but each has its own priorities. The curriculum of Tongji University focuses on the systematization and comprehensiveness of theoretical knowledge, encourages interdisciplinary learning and cultivates broad talents, while Politecnico di Milano puts more emphasis on the combination of theory and practice to provide diversified directions and train engineers to meet the needs of enterprises. Both universities have made remarkable achievements in their internationalization. Combined with the different curriculum systems and teaching methods of the two schools, this study puts forward suggestions on the reform of engineering education, which provides reference for cultivating compound civil engineers with international vision, innovation ability and practical skills.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘洋昊,余江滔,刘鑫,张国栋,尹天颖,夏露,董穆蝶,赵忆露.同济大学与米兰理工大学在土木工程专业教学模式上的比较研究[J].高等建筑教育,2026,35(1):37-46.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码