工程管理本科与硕士专业培养目标和知识体系分析与思考
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

河海大学商学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis of the Training Objectives and Knowledge System for Engineering Management Majors in Undergraduate and Master Levels
Author:
Affiliation:

Business School,Hohai University,Nanjing

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    工程管理是目前在我国本科与硕士研究生教育中同时存在的专业名称。作为不同培养层次下名称相同的专业,其专业内涵、培养目标、专业知识体系是否相同?这为高等教育界和企业界相关人士所关心。在比较分析本科与硕士层面工程管理内涵、国内外工程管理专业人才培养目标和知识体系的基础上,建议将本科工程管理专业名称改为建设(工程)管理专业,并增加建设工程交易和项目治理相关知识,以使专业名称和专业内涵更相吻合;提出工程管理硕士(MEM)专业学位应以企业技术创新与新产品开发、重大工程建设等各领域技术开发及创新管理的高层次人才培养为主要目标,并构建相应的知识体系。

    Abstract:

    Engineering Management is currently used as the official major name for both undergraduate and master programs in China. For people in both academia and industry, it is of great significance whether the professional connotations, training objectives and professional knowledge systems of the two levels’ education should be the same. On the basis of analyzing the connotation of engineering management, the training objectives and knowledge system of engineering management professionals in China and abroad, the authors of this paper suggested that the official name of undergraduate engineering management should be changed to “Construction Project Management”. It is suggested that the relevant knowledge of construction engineering transaction theory and project governance theory should be appropriately increased in the undergraduate program to meet major’s connotation. This paper also suggested that the training mode and the knowledge system for the Master of Engineering Management (MEM) degree program should be adjusted based on the needs of high-level talents in R&D project management and technical management for engineering/technical companies.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-04
  • 最后修改日期:2020-03-05
  • 录用日期:2020-04-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码