开展国内外土木工程专业课程体系的对比研究,对调整和优化现有的课程设置有着重要的参考价值。选取同济大学、美国伊利诺伊大学和伦敦英国帝国学院三所土木名校为调研对象,与我校土木工程专业的课程体系进行了对比研究。对比分析包括培养目标、课程设置、基本学分要求、课程结构和专业类课程的构成和占比、核心课程等诸多方面。研究表明,伦敦帝国学院的培养目标对学生能力的毕业要求更为明确,值得借鉴；与国外高校相比,国内高校土木工程专业总学分要求偏多,课程总数偏多。在符合工程教育认证标准要求的前提下,适当降低总学分要求、精简课程规模、调整课程结构、加强专业核心课程的建设、实现本科和研究生课程贯通是我校土木工程专业课程设置调整和课程建设工作的重点。

The comparative study on the curriculum system of civil engineering specialty at home and abroad is of great reference value for the adjustment and optimization of the existing curriculum. Three famous civil engineering schools, namely Tongji University, University of Illinois and Imperial College London, were selected as the research objects, and the curriculum system of civil engineering major in our university was compared. Comparative analysis includes cultivation objectives, course setting, basic credit requirements, course structure, composition and proportion of specialized courses, core courses and so on. The research shows that the cultivation goal of Imperial College London is more specific to reflect the graduation requirements of students" abilities, which is worth learning from. Compared with foreign universities, civil engineering majors in domestic universities require more total credits and more courses. On the premise of meeting the requirements of Engineering Education Certification Standard, it is the key points of the course setting adjustment and course construction of our university to properly reduce the total credit requirement, brief the course scale, adjust the course structure, strengthen the construction of the core professional courses, and incorporate some postgraduate courses into the curriculum system.

G642.0

北京交通大学2018年教学改革项目“土木工程专业国际化建设中的问题和对策探究”