应用型本科生实践创新能力培养的“双回归路径”探索
作者单位:

台州学院

基金项目:

浙江省高等教育“十三五”第一批教学改革研究项目(jg20180343)


Exploration on the "double regression path" of application-oriented undergraduates' practice and innovation ability training
Affiliation:

Taizhou University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [12]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:目前应用型本科学生实践创新能力培养往往缺乏抓手。经过十余年的探索,总结出了“课外-课内-课外”和“全员-拔尖-全员”双回归路径,采用该路径能够以点带面、以老带新、以优秀学生带动普通学生在实践中培养创新能力,提高学生创新实践的主动性和参与面。该路径的构建首先从顶层设计入手,科学构建课内教学与课外实践相结合的创新人才培养体系;同时为学生搭建合理有效的赛教相融创新平台,保证创新能力培养由课内向课外延伸;最后优化选拔机制,分类培养学生的实践创新能力,确立学生在创新实践中的主体地位,保障培养效果。以建筑工程学院为例进行了实施,从学生的竞赛获奖、创新成果质量和数量、就业率、用人单位满意度反馈和毕业生满意度调查等方面都反映了该双回归路径对创新能力培养的有效性。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: The grasp is lacking in the cultivation of practical innovation ability of application-oriented undergraduates.After more than ten years of exploration, a dual return path of "extracurricular-in-class-extra-curricular" and "all-staff-top-notch-all" has been explored. Using this route could from point to area , the old to the new, and the excellent students to drive ordinary students in cultivate innovation ability in practice, and improved students' initiative and participation in innovative practice. The construction of this path started from the top-level design, and scientifically builds an innovative talent training system that combines in-class teaching and extra-curricular practice. At the same time,the teacher built a reasonable and effective innovation platform for students to integrate competition and education to ensure that the training of innovative ability extends from in-class to extra-curricular. Finally, the teacher optimized the selection mechanism, categorized and cultivated students' practical innovation ability, established the main status of students in innovative practice, and ensured the training effect. This method was implemented in the School of Civil Engineering & Architecture. The effectiveness of the dual return path in cultivating innovation ability was reflected in the students' awards in competitions, the quality and quantity of innovation results, employment rate, employer satisfaction feedback, and graduate satisfaction surveys.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘志林.高等教育层次结构与社会经济发展关系分析[J],高等工程教育研究,2019(5):120-126.
    [2] 中华人民共和国教育部.中国教育概况-2018年全国教育事业发展情况http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl /s5990/201909/t20190929_401639.html
    [3] 罗养霞,王浩鸣,杜延庆等.创新“文化驱动”与大学生创新意识培养研究[J],高教学刊,2017(3):59-60.
    [4] 陆国栋,陈临强,何钦铭等.高校学科竞赛评估:思路、方法和探索. 中国高教研究, 2018(2):63-68+74.
    [5] 李宜霖,周宗奎,牛更枫.数字技术对个体的影响[J],心理科学进展,2017年10期,2017, Vol25.(10):1799-1810.
    [6] 刘有耀,蒋林,杜慧敏等.工程应用型创新人才培养模式研究与实践[J].高等工程教育研究,2015(5):76-81.
    [7] Masanet Maria-Jose, Guerrero-Pico Mar, Establés María-José. From digital native to digital apprentice-A case study of the transmedia skills and informal learning strategies of adolescents in Spain[J]. Learning, Media & Technology. 2019, 44(4):400-413
    [8] 新华网.教育部部长:中国教育“玩命的中学、快乐的大学”的现象应该扭转[FB/OL].(2018-6-21). http;//www.xinhuanet.com/2018-06/21/c_1123018070.htm.
    [9] 德里克·博克.回归大学之道[M].侯定凯,梁爽,陈琼琼,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:29.
    [10] 徐立清. 地方应用型本科人才培养标准的设计思路与实现路径[J].高等教育研究,2017, 38(5):81-85.
    [11] Wei Zheng, ianjun Yin, HuiRu Shi. Prompted Self-Regulated Learning Assessment and Its Effect for Achieving ASCE Vision 2025[J]. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 2017, 143(2):1-10.
    [12] 莱比锡应用技术大学(HTWK)土木工程专业培养计划及课程大纲[FB/OL](2017).https://www.htwk-leipzig.de /en/studies/during-your-studies/organise-your-studies/
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:312
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-28
  • 最后修改日期:2020-08-31
  • 录用日期:2020-09-29
文章二维码