竞赛作为设计课程的教学组织与调查评价
作者:
作者单位:

苏州科技大学 建筑与城市规划学院

基金项目:

2019年度中国建设教育协会教育教学科研课题


The Teaching Organization and Investigation Evaluation of Competition as Design Course
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Architecture and Urban Planning Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [12]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    各类高水平设计竞赛对建筑学本科教学有良好的促进作用。在多种参赛组织形式中,选择竞赛作为设计课程组织全体师生参加拥有诸多优势,也存在一些难点。通过近年来组织的竞赛课程教学实践,分析了竞赛课程的优势与劣势,总结了从竞赛选题、课内教学到课后延伸辅导的教学组织过程。通过问卷调查分析发现:学生方面普遍积极评价了竞赛课程,多数能跟上竞赛节奏,但还存在更多方面的教学需求;教师方面也同样认同竞赛课程,认为原教学框架基本能适应竞赛要求,还需发展针对性的教改措施。总之,竞赛作为设计课程是一项可行且有益的教学活动,还需持续地积累经验、完善教学组织。

    Abstract:

    Various high-level design competitions are very helpful to the teaching of architecture undergraduates.Among the various forms of participation organization, choosing a competition as a design course organization for all teachers and students to participate has many advantages, but there are also some difficulties.Through the teaching practice of competition courses organized in recent years, the advantages and disadvantages of competition courses was analyzed, and the teaching organization process from competition topic selection, in-class teaching to extended after-school tutoring.was summarized. Through questionnaire survey analysis, it is found that students generally positively evaluate the competition courses, most of them can keep up with the competition rhythm, but there are more teaching needs; teachers also agree with the competition courses and believe that the original teaching framework can basically meet the requirements of the competition. Targeted education reform measures. were needed to develop. In short, competition as a design course is a feasible and beneficial teaching activity, and it is necessary to continuously accumulate experience and improve teaching organization.

    参考文献
    [1] 郭兴华,陈谦,毕晓莉.设计课程与设计竞赛结合实践研究[Z].2011全国高等学校城市规划专业指导委员会年会论文集,2011:389-392;
    [2] 刘萌旭,穆琳琳,齐阳.建筑设计竞赛反哺设计课程教学[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版),2013,18;
    [3] 龙灏.设计竞赛的价值2013“霍普杯”国际大学生建筑设计竞赛杂感[J]城市环境设计,2013(12):88-89;
    [4] 周曦,张芳.建筑学教学中设计竞赛的组织方式与保障机制研究[J].中国建筑教育,2018(02):31-34;
    [5] 冯天舒.概念式建筑设计竞赛及其工作方式的解析[D].天津:天津大学,2012;
    [6] 杨晓莉,庄程宇.以赛促教视角下的应用型大学建筑设计教学探索与研究[J].建筑与文化,2018(05):41-43;
    [7] 盖燕茹.设计竞赛与工程实践对建筑学专业设计课的影响——以建筑学四年级专业设计课为例[J].工程建设与设计 ,2018(04):21-24;
    [8] 金熙,周红.空间的应变表达——Revit杯竞赛获奖作品分析[J].华中建筑,2018(06):19-22;
    [9] 杜晓辉.太阳能建筑设计竞赛对当代建筑教学模式的启示[J].新建筑,2015(05):109-112;
    [10] 李刘蓓,夏晓敏.添加“竞赛分析”环节 提高“竞赛+课堂”教学模式的教学质量——以“建筑设计(四)”“竞赛+课堂”课程教学为例[J].中国建设教育:38-41;
    [11] 龙灏,田琦,王琦,邓蜀阳.体验式开放性建筑设计课教学法探讨[J].高等建筑教育,2011(01):131-134;
    [12] 孙湉.大学生建筑设计竞赛研究及获奖作品解析[D].南京:南京工业大学,2013;
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-16
  • 录用日期:2021-01-29
文章二维码