面向新工科五维形态的城乡规划课程结构反向设计研究
作者:
作者单位:

吉林建筑大学建筑与规划学院

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:

吉林省教育科学规划课题;吉林省高等教育教学改革研究课题


Reverse curriculum structure design of urban and rural planning under the coupling of engineering five dimensional form
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Architecture and Urban Planning,Jilin Jianzhu University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [14]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    响应我国“新工科”建设新形势及生态文明建设需求,城乡规划教学“成果”如何匹配国土空间发展尤为重要。城乡规划作为实践性较强的工科专业,课程成果是直接检验其授课效果成功与否的高效工具。针对目前理论课程设计中课程成果路径设置模糊、实践创新性不足、理论知识繁杂枯燥等问题,本研究面向新工科人文维度、规模维度、政治维度、产业维度与人文维度等新工科“五维”形态,将OBE理念分解为五个阶段运用到设计课程结构设计中,结合课程技术、规模、政治与人文成果形成知识模块、能力模块及素质模块制定结构反向设计路径,力求使提升城乡规划工科专业理论课教学效果,应对“新工科”背景下的人才培养对学生能力和创新思维提出的更高要求。

    Abstract:

    In response to the situation of China's construction and the needs of ecological civilization construction, how to match the achievements of urban and rural planning teaching with the development of land and space is particularly important. As an engineering major with strong practicality, urban and rural planning curriculum results are an efficient tool to directly test the success of its teaching effect. In view of the problems such as the fuzzy setting of curriculum achievement path, lack of practical innovation, complex and boring theoretical knowledge in the current theoretical curriculum design, this study focuses on the five-dimensional form of engineering, such as humanistic dimension, scale dimension, political dimension, industrial dimension and humanistic dimension, and puts OBE (outcomes based education) concept divided into five stages, and applied to the design of curriculum structure. Combined with the curriculum technology, scale, politics and humanities achievements, the knowledge module, ability module and quality module are formed to formulate the structural reverse design path, so as to improve the teaching effect of theoretical courses of urban and rural planning engineering specialty and deal with the engineering training to put forward higher requirements for students' ability and innovative thinking.

    参考文献
    [1] 黄贤金,张晓玲,于涛方,耿慧志,曾鹏,于涛,罗小龙,李翅,殷洁,申世广,楚建群,王波,金晓斌,陈逸,朱道林,卞正富,杨俊,宋戈,郭杰,吴宇哲.面向国土空间规划的高校人才培养体系改革笔谈[J]. 中国土地科学,2020,34(08):107-114.
    [2] 谢冰蕾,吴琳华. 融入区域发展的新工科教育建设:逻辑、挑战与进路[J]. 中国高教研究,2021,4(06):51-56.
    [3] 巩文斌. 基于虚拟现实的新工科建筑类专业多学科融合创新平台构建[J]. 实验室研究与探索,2021,40(04):247-251.
    [4] 马廷奇. 新工科建设的范式转换及实现路径[J]. 中国高等教育,2021,4(02):16-18.
    [5] 余建星,纪颖,余杨,于泓,段庆昊. 新工科人才培养的关键变革与创新实践——基于天津大学的分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2020,4(03):71-77.
    [6] 袁红,余雷,孙立宁. 地方高校新工科创新型人才培养探析—以苏州大学机电类专业实践新模式与方法为例[J]. 中国高校科技,2021,4(06):75-79.
    [7] 孙虹,刘建中,刘沛平,司靖宇,高大明,高先和,徐泽忠,卢军. 《中国制造2025》背景下基于产教融合协同创新视域的新工科实践教学体系研究与构建[J]. 教育教学论坛,2020,4(49):299-300.
    [8] 李翠敏,王晓春. 新工科背景下地方高校人才培养新模式探索[J]. 大学教育,2020,4 (04):154-156.
    [9] 吴慎将,张维光,聂亮,段存丽,王佳. “新工科”建设视域下传统专业实践教学改革模式研究与实践[J].高教学刊,2021,7(15):125-128.
    [10] 刘音,程卫民,刘震. 新工科背景下多学科交叉融合“安全+”人才培养模式探讨与实践[J]. 科技与创新,2021,4 (10):154-155.
    [11] 乐阳,李清泉,郭仁忠. 融合式研究趋势下的地理信息教学体系探索[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(08):1790-1796.
    [12] Spady, W.G. Outcome-Based Education Critical Issues and Answers [A]. American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, 1994:1-10.
    [13] Azrul A. Mutalib, Roszilah Hamid, Firdaus Mohd. Hamzah, Shahrum Abdullah. Implementation of OBE in the Engineering Graphics Course and Analysis of Academic Performance[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 60:184-188.
    [14] 王国强,卢秀泉,金祥雷,王瑞. 成果导向教育理念的新工科通识教育体系构建研究[J]. 高等工程教育研究,2021,4 (04):29-34.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:285
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-13
  • 最后修改日期:2022-01-05
  • 录用日期:2022-03-04
文章二维码