基于课程思政的土木工程材料课程设计与实践
作者单位:

东南大学


Design and practice of the curriculum of civil engineering materials based on course ideology and politics
Affiliation:

Southeast University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [10]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    将思政元素融入专业课程教学是高等教育课程改革的必然趋势和重要方向。以土建类专业基础课程土木工程材料为例,针对课程知识点多而琐碎、工程背景强、试验环节多等特点,通过深入挖掘思政元素,提出了相适应的课程思政设计方法,主要包括以大国工程引入激发学生专业热情、以实际工程事故教导学生工程伦理、以工程案例为教学单元培养学生实事求是作风、以第二课堂培养学生自主探索能力等。同时,详细介绍了东南大学土木工程材料系土木工程材料课程思政方法的实践路径与评价方式。结果表明,该方法有助于激发学生的专业热情与爱国主义情怀,培育社会责任感、职业道德、工程伦理和工匠精神,落实全员育人、全过程育人、全方位育人理念,可为相似专业的课程思政建设提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Integrating ideological and political elements into professional curriculum teaching is an inevitable trend and important direction of higher education curriculum reform. Taking civil engineering materials for the basic courses of civil engineering as an example, according to the characteristics of the course knowledge points are many and trivial, the engineering background is strong, and the experiment links are many, through in-depth digging of ideological and political elements, a suitable curriculum-based ideological and political design method is proposed, mainly including the introduction of major country projects to stimulate students' professional enthusiasm, practical engineering accidents to teach students engineering ethics, engineering cases as the teaching unit to cultivate students' pragmatic style, the second classroom to cultivate students' independent exploration ability and etc. In addition, based on the actual situation of the Department of Civil Engineering Materials, Southeast University, the practice path and evaluation method of curriculum ideological and political methods are introduced. The results show that this method can help stimulate students' professional enthusiasm and patriotism, cultivate social responsibility, professional morality, engineering ethics and craftsman spirit, and implement the concept of full-staff education, full-process education, and all-round education, which can provide references for curriculum ideological and political construction of similar majors.

    参考文献
    [1] 杨国斌,龙明忠.课程思政的价值与建设方向[J].中国高等教育,2019(23):15-17.
    [2] 盛振文.深入推进课程思政建设的“四合”路径[J].中国高等教育,2021(17):45-46+55.
    [3] 王博,李红,吴涛.混凝土结构基本理论课程思政初探[J].高等建筑教育,2021,30(05):185-190.
    [4] 王文静,张大富,许念勇.以课程思政为引领的土木工程施工课程教学改革[J].高等建筑教育,2021,30(05):191-197.
    [5] 顾晓薇,胥孝川,孙雷,等.工科类专业课程思政教学探索与实践[J].中国高等教育,2021(Z3):59-61.
    [6] 韩宪洲.以课程思政推动立德树人的实践创新[J].中国高等教育,2019(23):12-14.
    [7] 王秋怡.推进课程思政落实立德树人根本任务[J].中国高等教育,2021(02):37-38.
    [8] 蒋金洋,刘志勇,佘伟.多尺度分析方法在土木工程材料教学中的探索与实践[J].高等建筑教育,2017,26(02):44-46.
    [9] 张利,刘永,苏胜,等.素质教育背景下的土木工程材料教学体系的构建[J].高等建筑教育,2007(01):61-63.
    [10] 谢振国.土木工程材料课程课堂教学方法探讨[J].高等建筑教育,2009,18(03):78-80.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:183
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-18
  • 最后修改日期:2022-02-18
  • 录用日期:2022-05-06
文章二维码