从目标达成角度探讨工程专业课程如何融入思政元素
作者:
作者单位:

重庆大学 土木工程学院


Exploring how to integrate the ideological and political education in engineering courses from the perspective of goal attainment
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [14]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    既有工程教育体系缺少科学技术“价值理性”方面的教育,高校教师不论在思想还是行动上都存在工程教育与价值目标脱钩的情况。课程思政的提出为工程伦理目标的达成提供了具体的内容范式,但中国工程教育专业认证并未融入本国特色和文化的内容。基于建构主义学习理论,采用乔纳森建构学习环境模型解构“高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要”给出的课程思政内容,从目标达成角度探讨思政育人目标如何融入工程教育认证标准毕业目标并逐层拆解为课程育人目标,构建了包括课程体系、课程的持续改进及考核目标达成分析三部分内容的面向产出的执行路径。以《交通工程》和《路桥检测技术》两门不同类型的土木工程专业课为例进行了案例及结果分析,证实了该方法的可行性,为课程思政目标达成的实施路径提供一种参考。

    Abstract:

    The existing engineering education system lacks education on the "value rationality" of science and technology, and there is a disconnection between engineering education and value objectives in the mindset and actions of university teachers. The curriculum thinking and politics proposal has provided a concrete content paradigm for achieving ethical engineering objectives. Still, the professional certification of engineering education in China has not incorporated the content of national characteristics and culture. Based on constructivist learning theory, Jonathan's constructive learning environment model was adopted to deconstruct the content of curriculum ethics in the "Guidance Outline for the Construction of Courses for Ideological and Political Education in Higher Education Institutions". The ethical education goals are integrated into the graduation goals of engineering education accreditation standards and dismantled into curriculum ethic goals layer by layer from the perspective of goal attainment and construct a three-part content including curriculum system, continuous improvement of curriculum and assessment goal attainment analysis. The path of output-oriented implementation was constructed. Two different types of professional courses in civil engineering, namely "Traffic Engineering" and "Road and Bridge Detection Technology", are taken as examples for the case study. The feasibility of the method is verified to provide a reference for the implementation pathway for achieving the objectives of ideological and political education.

    参考文献
    [1] 钟波涛,吴海涛,陶婵娟,等.基于知识图谱的工程伦理教育研究现状述评[J].高等建筑教育,2020,29(2):122-129.
    [2] Zhu Xiaoman and Liu Cilin. Teacher training for moral education in China[J]. Journal of Moral Education, 2004, 33:4, 481-494, DOI: 10.1080/0305724042000315608.
    [3] 中国工程教育专业认证协会.工程教育认证标准[S]. T/CEEAA 001-2015.
    [4] 中国工程教育专业认证协会.工程教育认证标准[S]. T/CEEAA 001-2022.
    [5] 朱露,胡德鑫,何桢,顾佩华.国际工程教育专业认证体系的发展与改革—基于《华盛顿协议》与欧洲工程教育专业认证体系的对比分析[J].高等工程教育研究,2022,第4期,38-51.
    [6] 林健,衣芳青.面向未来的工程伦理教育[J].高等工程教育研究,2021(05):1-11.
    [7] 富海鹰,杨成,李丹妮,张铮.“三全育人”视角下工科课程思政实践探究[J].高等工程教育研究, 2021(05):94-99,165.
    [8] Jonassen,D.H.,Howland,J’ Moore,J, Marra, R.M. Learning to solve problems with technology:A constructivist perspective, 2nd. Ed.Columbus,OH:Merrill/Prentice—Hall, 2003, 21.
    [9] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[S].教高[2020]3号.
    [10] Fanli Jia, Tobias Krettenauer and Lihong Li. Moral identity in cultural context: Differences between Canadian and Chinese university students[J]. Journal of Moral Education, 2019, 48:2, 247-262, DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2018.1499504.
    [11] 李妍.乔纳森建构主义学习环境设计研究[D].华东师范大学,2007,上海.
    [12] 李恒.工程伦理教育的关键机制研究[D].浙江大学,2021,浙江省杭州市.
    [13] Rob Lawlor. Teaching engineering ethics: a dissenting voice, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education[J]. 2021, 26:1, 38-46, DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1925404.
    [14] Joyce Aalberts, Edwin Koster and Robert Boschhuizen. From prejudice to reasonable judgment: integrating (moral) value discussions in university courses[J]. Journal of Moral Education, 2012, 41:4, 437-455, DOI: 10.080/03057240.2012.677600.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:76
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-19
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-10
  • 录用日期:2022-10-24
文章二维码