+高级检索
首页 > 优先出版
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
国外建筑学高等教育研究热点前沿与启示
作者:
作者单位:

重庆大学建筑城规学院

基金项目:

重庆英才计划“包干制”项目(2021YC009)；国家自然科学基金会青年(51908078)


Research frontiers and and enlightenment of foreign architecture education
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [54]
    • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近10年国外建筑学教学与教学研究蓬勃发展，基于Web of Science核心数据库，利用文献计量软件探究建筑学教育主要概况、研究热点与发展阶段。近年来国外建筑学教育研究整体趋势从初步设计转向设计研究、工程实践、知识体系、利用技术与科学手段教学。领域热点主要集中在工作室设计课、理论课、数字技术课程的创新与发展，重视思维能力、跨学科、可持续性、实践等教学理念，关注认知分类、学生兴趣、项目导向、通信技术等教学方法，以及多元化的教学评估。通过国外研究热点分析以及结合国内建筑学高等教育窘境，在建筑学教学改革方面，基于设计与理论课程、教学理念与教学方法创新，以设计课程为轴线，融通符合时代需求的多专业、技术性、实践化的综合知识；在建筑学教学研究方面，构建以学生为课程主体的教学模式，让学习成果补给课题研究，此外建筑学高校教师应以学科“本体”研究为内核，形成交叉学科研究体系。国内新工科背景下建立良性的教学与研究供给关系可作为建筑学可持续发展的观念与手段。通过对国外近10年建筑学教育相关文献进行分类梳理与热点追踪，希望对国内当前建筑教学研究与教学改革提供思路。

    Abstract:

    In recent 10 years, architecture education abroad has been developing vigorously. Based on the core database of Web of Science, this paper uses bibliometric software to explore the overview, research highlights and development stages of architecture education. In recent years, the overall trend of architecture education research abroad has shifted from preliminary design to design research, engineering practice, knowledge system, and the use of technology and scientific means for teaching. The research highlights mainly focus on the architecture design studio and theoretical course innovation and diverse teaching evaluation; teaching concepts like thinking ability, interdisciplinary, sustainability and practice; teaching methods like Bloom Taxonomy, student interest, project based learning and ICT development; as well as diversified teaching evaluation. Through the analysis of foreign research highlights and in combination with the dilemma of domestic architecture education, in the aspect of architecture teaching reform, based on innovation in design and theoretical courses, teaching concepts, and teaching methods, the courses should integrate multidisciplinary, technical, and practical comprehensive knowledge that meets the needs of the times. In the field of architecture teaching research, curriculum should construct the teaching mode with students as the main body, allowing students' learning outcomes to supplement research projects. In addition, teachers should take architecture "identity" research as the core and form the interdisciplinary research system. Establishing a benign supply relationship between teaching and research in the context of new engineering in China can serve as a concept and means for sustainable development of architecture in university. This article aims to provide ideas for current architecture teaching research and teaching reform in China by sorting out and tracking relevant literature on architecture education in the past 10 years abroad.

    参考文献
    [1] Butragueno B, Fco. Raposo J, Salgado MA. The Bologna Process Applied to Creative Experiences[C]// 12TH International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation.Valenica: Iated-Int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2019: 1539-1545.
    [2] Sochacka N W, Guyotte K W, Walther J, et al. Faculty reflections on a STEAM-inspired interdisciplinary studio course[C]// ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.
    [3] Makakl E S. STEAM approach in architectural education[J]. SHS Web of Conferences, 2019, 66(4): 01012.
    [4] De Santos-Berbel C, Hernando Garcia JI, De Santos Berbel L. Undergraduate Student Performance in a Structural Analysis Course: Continuous Assessment before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak[J].Education sciences, 2022;12 561.
    [5] Mudzinska M. Collaborative and Problem-based Learning in Architectural Education: Example of Silesia Brownfields Study[C]// 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. 2015: 6248-6254.
    [6] Orhan M. The Role and Importance of Workshops in the Architectural Design Education; Case of "Self Made Architecture I-II"[J].New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2017, 3(3): 131–136.
    [7] Ceylan S, Soygenis S. Improving Architecture Students’ Design Skills: A Studio Experience[J].The international journal of art design education, 2022, 41(2): 320-340
    [8] Alakavuk E, Polat C. Integral Design Studio Experience in Architecture Undergraduate Education[C]// 9th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference. 2016: 5058-5061.
    [9] Asu, Besgen. Teaching/Learning Strategies Through Art: Painting and Basic Design Education[C]//Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015, 182: 420-427.
    [10] Lopez M V, Contreras M, Sanz S M. The Importance of Architectural Drawing in the University[C]// 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. 2019: 1971-1979.
    [11] Qian C, Fior M, Chun M J. Bridging Tradition and the New in Design Sketching Through Digital Free-hand Drawing and its Impact on Student Learning[C]// 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valenica: Iated-Int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2018: 2471-2477.
    [12] Büyükm?h?? G, Karahan S, K?l?? A. Conservation Education Techniques: The Role and Importance of Modern Technology[C]// International Educational Technology Conference. 2015, 176: 1063-1070.
    [13] Zhou X X, Zhou X R, Kobashi K, et al. Development of History Learning Support System: 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Ancient Japanese Architectures[C]// 11th International Conference on Computer Science Education. 2016:317-320.
    [14] Gawad I. History of architecture education: potentials and limitations for a better design problem solving[C]// 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Valenica: Iated-Int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2014:3086-3093.
    [15] Hassanpour B, Ahin N P. Technology Adoption in Architectural Design Studios for Educational Activities[J]. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 2021, 30:491-509.
    [16] Riggio M, Cheng Y W. Computation and Learning Partnerships: Lessons from Wood Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Integration[J]. Education Sciences, 2021, 11(3):124.
    [17] Hu M. BIM-Enabled Pedagogy Approach: Using BIM as an Instructional Tool in Technology Courses[J]. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2018, 145(1):05018017.
    [18] Azhar S, Kim J, Salman A. Implementing Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality Technologies in Construction Education: Students'' Perceptions and Lessons Learned[C]// 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. 2018: 3720-3730.
    [19] Yi H. Robotics Application for the Advanced Integration of Design and Technology in Architecture[J]. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2021: 1146-1162.
    [20] Caskurlu S, Richardson J C, Alamri H A, et al. Cognitive Load and Online Course Quality: Insights from Instructional Designers in a Higher Education Context.[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2021, 52(2): 584-605.
    [21] MA Núez-Andrés, Martinez-Molina A, Casquero-Modrego N, et al. The Impact of Peer Learning on Student Performance in an Architectural Sustainability Course[J]. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2021, 23(1): 159-176.
    [22] Avsec S, Jagiello-Kowalczyk M. Developing a Framework to Predict Factors Significant for Creative Architectural Design Performance of Freshmen and Senior Architecture Students, by Adopting and Validating the CEDA[J].The International journal of engineering education. 2021, 37(3): 594-607.
    [23] Awidi I T, Paynter M, Vujosevic T. Facebook Group in the Learning Design of a Higher Education Course: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Positive Learning Experience for Students[J]. Computers Education, 2019, 129(2):106-121.
    [24] Crowther P, Briant S. Gender-Based Differences in Academic Achievement in a University Design Program[J].The international journal of art design education. 2022(41): 631-643.
    [25] Gaspar K, Nú?ez-Andres MA, Rodríguez JJ, Jordana F. Influence of Admission Marks on the Academic Performance of Technical Architecture Students[J].The International journal of engineering education. 2016, 32(1): 209-218.
    [26] Ibrahim NLN, Utaberta N. Learning in Architecture Design Studio.Procedia, social and behavioral sciences.AMSTERDAM: Elsevier; 2012;60:30-35.
    [27] Fernandez-Antolin M M, JM Del Río, Gonzalez-Lezcano R A. The Use of Gamification in Higher Technical Education: Perception of University Students on Innovative Teaching Materials[J]. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2021, 31(5):1019-1038.
    [28] Pitarch M, Rubio J, Moya J, et al. The Use of Cut-Out Paper as Methodology of Expression Graphics Advanced, For the Understanding of Space and Architecture[C]// 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valencia IATED-INT ASSOC Technology Education Development, 2014: 1839-1845.
    [29] Genereux W E, Lewis K M. Pumpkin carving as an exercise in design process thinking[C]// IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.NEW YORK: IEEE, 2014: 1-7.
    [30] Topaloglu, G. Teaching/Learning Strategies Through Art: Theatre and Basic Design Education[J]. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 182:331-337.
    [31] Balcer-Zgraja M. Architectural Design And a Third Teacher Concept in a Digital Era. Play Culture, Informal Learning And Public Space Solutions for Community Building[C]// 9th International Conference On Education And New Learning Technologies.Valenica: Iated-Int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2017: 8332-8342.
    [32] Balcer-Zgraja M. Play In Architectural Didactics[C]// 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies.Valenica: Iated-int Assoc Technology Education A Development, 2016: 4315-4324.
    [33] Duda M, Niculae R. Gamification As Means Of Getting From E-learning To Experience Learning In Architecture[J]. Rethinking Education By Leveraging The Elearning Pillar Of The Digital Agenda For Europe!, Vol. Ii. Bucharest: Carol I Natl Defence Univ Publishing House, 2015: 88-93.
    [34] Bender D. Wicked Problems: The Benefits of Project-based Learning Within a Studio Setting[C]// 12th International Technology, Education And Development Conference (inted). Valenica: Iated-int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2018: 1486-1491.
    [35] Altay B, Ballice G, Bengisu E, Alkan-Korkmaz S, Payko? E. Embracing student experience in inclusive design education through learner-centred instruction[J]. International journal of inclusive education. 2016, 20(11): 1123-1141.
    [36] Melian-Melian J A, Martin-Gutierrez J. Design and Usability of Learning Objects Applied in Graphic Expression[J]. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2018, 26(5):1134-1149.
    [37] JA Melián-Melián, J Martín-Gutiérrez. Improving the Professional Competencies of Architect Students[J]. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 10925:70-80.
    [38] Alberti M G. Some Web-Based Experiences from Flipped Classroom Techniques in AEC Modules during the COVID-19 Lockdown[J]. Education Sciences, 2021, 11(5): 211.
    [39] Sung H Y, Hwang G J, Liu S Y, et al. A Prompt-based Annotation Approach to Conducting Mobile Learning Activities for Architecture Design Courses[J]. Computers Education, 2014, 76(6): 80-90.
    [40] Blaasvaer L, Sevaldson B. Ducational Planning for Systems-oriented Design: Applying Systemic Relationships to Meta-mapping of GIGA Maps[C]// 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E and PDE), 2019.
    [41] Han H C, Mi J K. The effects of analogical and metaphorical reasoning on design thinking[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2017, 23, 29-41.
    [42] Ramaraj A, Nagammal J. Examining the Plausibility of Fostering Creativity through Puzzles in Architectural education: An Exploratory Sequential Study[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2017,24, 48-62.
    [43] Savic M, Kashef M. Learning Outcomes in Affective Domain Within Contemporary Architectural Curricula[J]. International Journal of Technology Design Education, 2013,23(4): 987-1004.
    [44] Oliveira S, Olsen L, Malki-Epshtein L, et al. Transcending Disciplines in Architecture, Structural and Building Services Engineering: A New Multidisciplinary Educational Approach[J]. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2021, 32(2): 1247-1265.
    [45] Bruhn M C, Feineman M, Gulick D, et al. Creating a Successful Online Interdisciplinary Course: Four Perspectives[C]// 12th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Valenica: Iated-int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2019: 8849-8858.
    [46] Reed J, Mera E. Developing Integrated Studies Programs in "sustainability" Through International Exchange, Experience Based Learning, and Multi-disciplinary Collaboration[C]// 4th International Conference of Education, Research And Innovation. Valenica: Iated-int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2011: 6266-6271.
    [47] Erkarslan OE,Akgun Y. Incorporating United Nations 2030 Sustainable Future Agenda into the Architectural Studio: A Graduation Studio Case[J]. International Journal of Art Design Education, 2022.
    [48] Radwan A, Morsi A. Integration of Reusing Materials as a Tool in Sustainable Design Education[C]// 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valenica: Iated-int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2018: 9743-9758.
    [49] Ceylan S, Topu E M. Adapting Leed Criteria into Architectural Design to Provide a Perspective for Energy Efficiency in an Undergraduate Design Studio Course: A Case Study[C]// 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies.Valenica: Iated-Int Assoc Technology Education Development, 2017: 2658-2668.
    [50] Makakl E S . STEAM Approach in Architectural Education[J]. SHS Web of Conferences, 2019, 66(4):01012.
    [51] Afacan, Y. Introducing Sustainability to Interior Design Students Through Industry Collaboration[J]. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2014, 15(1): 84-97.
    [52] Stam L, Ostuzzi F, Heylighen A. Open Design: An actual topic in architectural education[J]. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2020, 32 (1): 667-693.
    [53] 卢峰, 黄海静, 龙灏. 开放式教学——建筑学教育模式与方法的转变[J]. 新建筑, 2017(3): 44-49.
    [54] 韩冬青, 鲍莉, 朱雷,等. 关联·集成·拓展——以学为中心的建筑学课程教学机制重构[J]. 新建筑, 2017(3): 34-38.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:270
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-26
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-19
  • 录用日期:2023-04-12
文章二维码
您是第10072316 位访问者
主管单位：中国建设教育协会
主办单位：重庆大学 中国建设教育协会普通高等教育专业委员会
地址：重庆市沙坪坝区重庆大学A校区
电话：023-65112294
高等建筑教育 ® 2025 版权所有