系统论视域下印度理工学院本硕贯通式工程教育人才培养模式的实践与启示
作者单位:

1.扬州大学教育科学学院;2.扬州大学

基金项目:

2022年江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“新工科背景下工科生工程伦理教育优化路径研究”(KYCX22-3414)的研究成果;教育部人文社会科学研究青年“合法的边缘性参与视域下工科实习生的身份问题与建构研究”(21YJC880018),主持人:甘宜涛;


The practice and enlightenment of the talent cultivation mode of the integration of undergraduate and postgraduate engineering education in Indian Institute of Technology
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Educational Science,Yangzhou University Jiangsu Yangzhou;2.扬州大学

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [20]
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    创新人才培养模式能够为教育强国建设提供有力支撑,探索本硕贯通式工程教育人才培养模式,有助于提升工程人才培养质量。工程教育人才培养模式属于系统性问题,研究以系统论作为理论基础,从工程教育人才培养模式的诸要素入手,解构和探索印度理工学院五年制本硕贯通式工程教育人才培养实践。研究发现其贯通式工程教育人才培养呈现特点如下:严进严出,保障培养质量;打破本硕管理壁垒,实现一体化管理;注重政产学合作,实现协同育人;以学生为中心,发挥学生的自主性等。基于此,研究认为未来工程人才培养应坚持跨学科的培养理念,强化质量意识;完善本硕贯通的培养机制,注重人才培养的连贯性;多方协同育人,形成育人共同体;以学生为中心,满足多元发展需要。

    Abstract:

    The innovative talent training mode can provide robust support for the construction of educational prowess, and exploring the integration of undergraduate and postgraduate of engineering education talent training is conducive to enhancing the quality of engineering talent development. The training of talents in engineering education is a systematic problem. The research takes system theory as the theoretical basis and starts with the elements of the training mode of talents in engineering education.This study to deconstruct and explore the five-year undergraduate and postgraduate training practices at the Indian Institute of Technology in engineering education. It reveals that the characteristics of through-through engineering education talent training are as follows: stringent entry and exit requirements ensure training quality; breaking down management barriers between master's programs facilitates integrated management; emphasizing collaboration among government, industry, and academia promotes cooperative education; prioritizing student-centered approaches allows for autonomy in talent development. Based on these findings, this research suggests that future engineering talent training should adhere to interdisciplinary training concepts while strengthening awareness of quality; improve the through-the-master's program's training mechanism with attention to continuity in talent development; foster multi-party cooperation in education to form an educational community; prioritize student-centered approaches to meet diverse developmental needs.

    参考文献
    [1] 赵晓峰.新形势下社会科学研究生培养应注重“三个贯通”[J].研究生教育研究,2021(6):58-62+76.
    [2] Trilokekar, R. D. (2018).?Higher Education Systems and Institutions, India. Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, 1–15.
    [3] C Nataraju and Warrier Uma. A Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Affecting the Quality of Technical Education in India[J]. Electrochemical Society Transactions, 2022, 107(1).
    [4] 崔淑淇,姚聪莉.本科层次职业教育人才培养的内在逻辑、目标定位与实现路径[J].现代教育管理,2023(4):97-108.
    [5] Indian Institute of Technology.QS World University Ranking by subject for 2023.[EB/OL].[2023-11-11].https://www.iitb.ac.in/en/breaking-news/qs-world-university-rankings-subject-2023.
    [6] 常甜,周雨晴,马早明.世界一流大学内部质量保障体系的建构阐释与启示——以新加坡国立大学为例[J].高教探索,2023(3):86-96.
    [7] 庄丽君.印度高等工程教育专业认证的特点[J].高教发展与评估,2016(1):47-53+120.
    [8] [9]刘海燕.欧洲高等教育政策视域下“以学生为中心学习”改革新动向[J].比较教育研究,2021(7):65-73.
    [9] [10]Indian Institute of Technology.education.[EB/OL].[2022-11-9].https://www.iitb.ac.in/en/education.
    [10] [11]陈仕品,张剑平.政产学研合作:探索我国教育技术发展的新途径[J].电化教育研究,2012(7):15-21.
    [11] [8][12][18]杨院,刘卫涛.印度理工学院工程创新人才培养实践及启示——基于四重螺旋创新生态系统的视角[J].中国高校科技,2021(3):49-53.
    [12] [13]车如山,季红波.印度理工学院精英人才培养及启示[J].高校教育管理,2013(1):48-52.
    [13] [14]郭菲:我在印度的701天[M].上海:上海文化出版社,2018:21.
    [14] [15]IMPRINT India.about.[EB/OL].[2023-12-15].https://imprint-india.org/about-imprint/imprint-overview.
    [15] [16]罗明强.以共研一架飞机为牵引的跨学科创新人才培养模式探索[J].高等工程教育研究,2023(2):38-44.
    [16] [17]苟斐斐.共性与个性:大学生跨学科学习行为基本特征与影响因素——基于35所高校的混合研究[J].中国高教研究,2023(3):42-49.
    [17] [19]阎光才.研究型大学本科课程体系与结构的变革[J].教育研究,2022(8):97-109.
    [18] [20]王嘉毅,马维林.再论“以学生为中心”的教学意蕴与实践样态[J].中国教育学刊,2015(8):66-72.
    [19] [21]刘宁宁.本硕阶段学生创新能力培养体系衔接现状及其成效研究——基于1464名学术型硕士生的分析[J].现代教育管理,2019(1):108-113.
    [20] [22]鄢彩玲,李鹏.德国“学习工厂”的经验与启示——兼论如何打通产教融合的“最后一公里”[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2020(10):70-77.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:93
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-11
  • 最后修改日期:2024-06-03
  • 录用日期:2024-12-02
文章二维码