学生交往对高校项目式学习的影响:基于社会网络分析视角
作者:
作者单位:

湖南城市学院 管理学院

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:

教育部新文科研究与改革实践项目:“‘工管交叉、深度实践’的工程管理专业人才培养模式研究与改革”,编号2021140102;湖南省普通高等学校教学改革研究项目:“技术赋能,产教融合:地方高校管理类专业应用复合型人才培养模式研究”,编号HNJG-2021-0866


The Mechanism of Daily Communication and Traditional Classroom Learning on the Formation of Project-based Learning of College Students: Based on Social Network Analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Management School Hunan City University,Yiyang,Hunan,413000;2.China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    项目型学习作为一类项目驱动、“干中学”的群体性学习方式已经在诸多高校推广应用。为探索项目型学习形成机理,从学生交往的中观视角,建立大学生日常交流、传统课堂学习和项目型学习三类整体网络。通过社会网络分析发现,传统课堂学习网络和项目型学习网络主要以行政班级区划,日常交流网络突破了行政班级界线;三类网络具备一定的结构相似性,但日常交流网络集聚度和中心性更高,传统课堂学习网络和项目型学习网络中高中心性成员重叠更普遍,且大部分为学业优秀学生;日常交流网络小圈子现象较明显,传统课堂学习和项目型学习网络中大部分节点能形成互相交流网络;回归结果显示,日常交流网络和传统课堂学习网络对项目型学习均有正向显著影响。为促进项目型学习的形成,提出了鼓励学生在日常学习生活中加大沟通交流、在项目型学习团队中同时配置学业优秀学生和日常交流活跃分子、调动更多学业优秀学生成为团队核心、适当在团队成员中设置一定数量异性的建议。

    Abstract:

    As one of group learning models characterized by project-driven, "learning by doing", project-based learning has been widely applied in many universities. In order to explore the formation mechanism of project-based learning, this paper established three types of whole networks of daily communication, traditional classroom learning and project-based learning for college students from the perspective of students' communication. Social network analysis illustrated that the traditional classroom learning network and project-based learning network are mainly divided according to class borders, and the daily communication network has significant cross-class structure; The three types of networks have some similarities in structure, but the daily communication network has higher concentration and centrality. In the traditional classroom learning network and project-based learning network, the membership overlap is more common, and most of members are excellent students; Daily communication network has more “small circles”, which are characterized by some separated groups internally contain several tightly connected members. Most nodes in traditional classroom learning and project-based learning network are interactively connected. The regression results show that daily communication network and traditional classroom learning network have positive and significant impact on project-based learning. In order to promote the project-based learning, suggestions include encouraging students to increase communication in their daily study and life, allocating excellent students and active students in the project-based learning, motivating more excellent students to join in, and appropriately allocating some heterosexuals to the project-based team.

    参考文献
    [1] [ ]赵以霞,张思思,陶奕湲,李治.新工科背景下基于前沿交叉学科项目引导的深度学习[J].高等工程教育研究,2019, 178(05):41-47.
    [2] [ ] Bell S. Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future[J]. The clearing house, 2010, 83(2): 39-43.
    [3] [ ]赵永生,刘毳,赵春梅.高阶思维能力与项目式教学[J].高等工程教育研究,2019, 179(06):145-148+179.
    [4] [ ]张安富.项目化教学是提高工程型人才培养质量的有效之法[J].高等工程教育研究,2019, 176(03):166-169.
    [5] [ ]张执南,张国洋,韩东,陶飞.基于知识图谱的项目式教学管理——以大学生创新实践项目为例[J].高等工程教育研究,2022, 193(02):58-62.
    [6] [ ]俞国燕,王贵,刘焕牢,安芬菊,赵娟.机械类专业项目驱动式实践教学模式的探索与实践[J].中国大学教学,2014,No.292(12):79-80+78.
    [7] [ ]王佑镁,李璐.设计型学习——一种正在兴起的学习范式[J].中国电化教育,2009, 273(10):12-16.
    [8] [ ]Kop R, Hill A. Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?[J]. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2008, 9(3): 1-13.
    [9] [ ]Goldie J G S. Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age?[J]. Medical teacher, 2016, 38(10): 1064-1069.
    [10] [ ]Brunello G, De Paola M, Scoppa V. Peer effects in higher education: Does the field of study matter?[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 48(3): 621-634.
    [11] [ ]Schneeweis N, Winter-Ebmer R. Peer effects in Austrian schools[J]. Empirical economics, 2007, 32(2): 387-409.
    [12] [ ]赵颖.同群效应如何影响学生的认知能力[J].财贸经济,2019,40(08):33-49.
    [13] [ ]方观富,朱颖,何欢浪.高校共产党员的模范效应研究——基于研究生学习同群效应的经验分析[J].财经研究,2022,48(02):63-77.
    [14] [ ]刘斌.高校大班教学的同群效应——基于对经济学课程教学中“小团体”的实证观察[J].重庆高教研究,2020,8(03):78-88.
    [15] [ ]王炳成,王敏,张士强.“人以群分”适用于大学生的学业成就吗——基于社会网络分析和Meta分析的方法[J].教育学报,2020,16(01):92-101.
    [16] [ ]陶永建,许迈进,田国华,刘珊珊.工科大学生专业社团学习现象研究——兼论与工科专业班级学习差异[J].高等工程教育研究,2022, 195(04):152-157+175.
    [17] [ ]谭娅,封世蓝,张庆华,龚六堂.同群压力还是同群激励?——高中合作小组的同群效应研究[J].经济学(季刊),2021,21(02):533-556.
    [18] [ ]Freeman L. The development of social network analysis[J]. A Study in the Sociology of Science, 2004, 1(687): 159-167.
    [19] [ ]Yu A Y, Tian S W, Vogel D, et al. Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts[J]. Computers & education, 2010, 55(4): 1494-1503.
    [20] [ ]Thaiposri P, Wannapiroon P. Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through teaching and learning by inquiry-based learning activities using social network and cloud computing[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 174: 2137-2144.
    [21] [ ]陈勇.基于社会网络学习视角的大学生职业能力形成路径研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,50(02):217-229.
    [22] [ ]黄椰曼,崔旭.社会网络对大学生学术素养养成的影响研究:以图情档本科生为例[J].图书馆理论与实践,2019,No.238(08):85-92.
    [23] [ ]Wakefield J, Frawley J K. How does students'' general academic achievement moderate the implications of social networking on specific levels of learning performance?[J]. Computers & Education, 2020, 144: 103694.
    [24] [ ]Ye D, Pennisi S. Analysing interactions in online discussions through social network analysis[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022, 38(3): 784-796.
    [25] [ ]付艳芳,杨浩,方娟,刘晓宁.基于UCINET的高职学生在线协作学习社会网络分析[J].系统仿真技术,2020,16(04):255-261.
    [26] [ ]徐萱,徐峰.基于块模型的大学生学习网络子群研究[J].现代教育技术,2015,25(06):96-101.
    [27] [ ]周平红,周洪茜,张屹,林利.深度学习视域下学习者协同知识建构历程的社会认知网络特征分析[J].电化教育研究,2021,42(09):99-107.
    [28] [ ]王春超,肖艾平.班级内社会网络与学习成绩——一个随机排座的实验研究[J].经济学(季刊),2019,18(03):1123-1152.
    [29] [ ]焦璨,吴换杰,黄玥娜,黄菲菲,张敏强.网络自相关模型在心理学研究中的应用——以同群效应、学习动机对青少年学业表现的影响为例[J].心理学报,2014,46(12):1933-1945.
    [30] [ ] Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asynchronous distance education. Educational technology research and development, 46(4), 115-122.
    [31] [ ]黄忠敬,王倩,陈唤春等.交往能力:中国青少年社会与情感能力测评分报告之五[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2021,39(09):93-108.
    [32] [ ]屈廖健,孙靓.研究型大学本科生课程学习参与度的影响因素及提升策略研究[J].高校教育管理,2019,13(01):113-124.
    [33] [ ]刘军.整体网分析讲义[M].上海:格致出版社,2009.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    引证文献 [0] 您输入的地址无效!
    没有找到您想要的资源,您输入的路径无效!

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:76
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:2024-05-31
  • 录用日期:2024-12-09
文章二维码