随着工程管理专业硕士招生数量增加，加强培养质量监控，学位论文成为培养质量衡量指标。本研究依据M高校学位论文评审的要求，确定论文选题、文献综述、论文水平、论文规范等四个方面作为一级节点，四位研究者借助Nvivo12.0 对学位论文的专家盲审意见书提出的问题与建议进行文本交叉编码分析，辨识形成14个二级节点，50个三级节点问题。其中，一级节点论文水平和论文规范性问题比例相对较高，二级节点选题研究、研究成果与前沿动态、研究对象、问题及方案、理论方法及技术选择、工作量及研究深度、结果应用性、结构与思路、文字表达、写作规范存在问题较多，并列举三级节点问题的具体表现。由此，提出监控学位论文质量管理建议。

As the number of students enrolled in the Master of Engineering Management program increases, there is a growing need for enhanced monitoring of training quality. Dissertations are increasingly becoming an indicator of training quality. This study identifies four primary aspects based on M University's dissertation evaluation requirements: topic selection, literature review, dissertation level, and dissertation standards. Four researchers utilized Nvivo12.0 to conduct a textual cross-coding analysis on issues and suggestions raised in expert blind review comments of the dissertations. They identified 14 secondary nodes and 50 tertiary node issues, with the primary nodes of dissertation level and standardization issues having relatively high proportions. The secondary nodes of topic research, research results and frontier dynamics, research subjects, problems and solutions, theoretical methods and technical selection, workload and research depth, result applicability, structure and thought process, language expression, and writing standards had numerous issues. The specific manifestations of the tertiary node issues are also listed. Consequently, recommendations for monitoring and managing the quality of dissertations are proposed.

G643

内蒙古自治区研究生教育教学改革项目：双一流建设背景下地方高校研究生教育内部质量保障体系优化(JGCG2022120)