对中国高校平均学分绩点制度的思考与建议
作者:
作者单位:

1.东南大学 土木工程学院;2.东南大学 教务处


Reflections and suggestions on the GPA system in Chinese universities
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University;2.Office of Academic Affairs, Southeast University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [10]
  • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着中国高等教育国际化进程的持续推进,源于欧美高校成绩评价体系的平均学分绩点已成为中国高校学业水平评价的主要指标。由于其与学生的评奖评优、免试研究生推荐、境内外升学等切身利益密切相关,从而引发了广泛的严重关切。针对当前中国高校在课程百分制成绩与绩点的转换方法上存在的利与弊进行了思考,并基于学习成效的科学评价,提出了推动中国高校与欧美高校在学生学业水平评价体系上接轨的两点建议。

    Abstract:

    With the continuous progress of internationalization of Chinese higher education, GPA derived from European and American university achievement evaluation system has become the main index of academic level evaluation of Chinese universities. In view of the typical problems existing in the course hundred-mark score and grade point conversion in Chinese colleges and universities, this paper puts forward two suggestions on scientific evaluation of learning results and promoting the integration of Chinese universities with European and American universities in the evaluation system of students" academic level.

    参考文献
    [1] 杨有龙,段亚军,张希颖. 学生绩点转化的统计分析与算法实现[J]. 大学教育, 2020(04): 41-44.
    [2] 赵婷婷,胡艳婷. 能为与应为:从本科生成绩单看绩点制的功能[J]. 大学教育科学, 2022(03): 31-39.
    [3] 刘五驹. “百分制”向“等级制”变革中的评价理念误区[J]. 江苏教育学院学报(社会科学版), 2005(06): 22-23.
    [4] 吕晓芹. 我国高校学分绩点制建构定位[J]. 高教探索, 2017(06): 51-55.
    [5] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高等学校学生管理规定(2005) [EB /OL]. 2005-03-25. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/200503/t20050325_81846. html.
    [6] 曹文振,王涛利. 中国“双一流”大学平均学分绩点(GPA)制度调查与反思——基于内容分析法[J]. 高教探索, 2021(04): 62-71.
    [7] 郑鹰. 关于绩点制问题的研讨[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2002(02): 211-215.
    [8] 刘强. 论高校学业考试“分数膨胀”及其应对策略———兼谈高校“等级制”取代“百分制”改革[J]. 高等教育研究学报, 2016(02): 86-91.
    [9] 吕晓芹. 学分绩点制评价体系的建构认同与基本要素[J]. 高教探索, 2019(11): 27-32.
    [10] 胡艳婷. 平庸的优秀:大学生量化评价中“分数至上”现象研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2023(12): 102-111.Reflections and suggestions on the GPA systemin Chinese universitiesTONG Xiaodonga, LU Jinyua,b, WAN Minb(a. School of Civil Engineering; b. Office of Academic Affairs,Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, P. R. China)Abstract: With the continuous progress of internationalization of Chinese higher education, GPA derived from European and American university achievement evaluation system has become the main index of academic level evaluation of Chinese universities. In view of the typical problems existing in the course hundred-mark score and grade point conversion in Chinese colleges and universities, this paper puts forward two suggestions on scientific evaluation of learning results and promoting the integration of Chinese universities with European and American universities in the evaluation system of students'' academic level.Keywords: GPA; hundred-mark score; internationalization; evaluation of academic level; classification conversion method; linear conversion method
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:151
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-07
  • 最后修改日期:2024-07-20
  • 录用日期:2024-09-14
文章二维码