研究性思维与建筑学设计类课程融合的思辨及路径
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.福建理工大学;2.苏州城市学院设计与艺术学院;3.福建理工大学建筑与城乡规划学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G642;TU201

基金项目:


Reflections and Pathways on the Integration of Research-Based Thinking and Architectural Design Courses
Author:
Affiliation:

1.福建理工大学;2.苏州城市学院设计与艺术学院;3.College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Fujian University of Technology

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究性思维在建筑学设计类课程中的引入有助于系统提升学生的问题意识、批判性思维与创新能力。以往研究多从理论分析出发,缺乏对多主体反馈的实证研究及对未来融合路径的进一步探讨。回溯了建筑学设计类课程中对设计性思维及研究性思维的训练,探讨两种思维融合的可能。采用半结构化访谈,对某建筑学院的教师、毕业生及在校生进行了调查。在此基础上,提出在建筑学本科大二第一学期和大四第二学期设置研究性思维训练,推动“设计中的研究”培养模块,以实现从基础培养到毕业设计的研究性能力的递进发展。

    Abstract:

    The introduction of research-based thinking into architectural design courses helps to systematically enhance students’ problem awareness, critical thinking, and innovation ability. Previous studies have mostly focused on theoretical analysis, with a lack of empirical research incorporating multi-stakeholder feedback and limited exploration of future integration pathways. A review was conducted on the training of design thinking and research-based thinking in architectural design courses, and the possibility of integrating the two modes of thinking was examined. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with faculty members, graduates, and current students in a school of architecture. Based on the findings, it is proposed that research-based thinking training be implemented in the first semester of the second undergraduate year and the second semester of the fourth year, in order to promote a “research in design” training module and to realize a progressive development of research ability from foundational learning to the final graduation design.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-16
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-01
  • 录用日期:2025-11-07
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码