国际工程教育期刊近二十年知识图谱 ——基于《Journal of Engineering Education》的文献计量分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

北京航空航天大学人文社会科学学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Knowledge Mapping of International Engineering Education Journals from 2004 to 2024 —— A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Journal of Engineering Education
Author:
Affiliation:

Beihang University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以SSCI期刊《Journal of Engineering Education》2004-2024年合计21年所载文献为研究对象,利用Citespace与VOSviewer两款软件进行文献计量学和知识图谱可视化分析,选取研究机构、作者、关键词、研究热点前沿作为关键变量,研究发现国外工程教育核心研究机构主要集中于工程学院及工程教育学院,发文量较多的作者大部分具有理工科复合背景,其中美国研究机构在本领域期刊的论文发文数量呈现显著优势,通过聚类分析发现有以下九大聚类:问题导向型学习、学术归属感、概念化学习、虚拟仿真实验平台、工程问题解决能力、性别影响因素、能力测评工具、工程职业素养、主动式学习,基于系统化的文献计量分析,绘制了工程教育研究的知识图谱,揭示了该领域的知识结构与研究热点分布。研究得出三条结论:美国工程教育体系的变革与其工业化进程存在关联,需深入考察国际工程教育典范案例的运行机制;现有研究在工程教育认识论与方法论层面日趋增多,说明工程教育研究已逐步达成系统化研究;在研究热点方面未来应着重拓展工程教育中的伦理与社会维度及社会心理因素相关研究。

    Abstract:

    This study conducted a bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping visualization of the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) documents from 2005 to 2019 using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Key variables such as research institutions, authors, keywords, cited documents, research hotspots, and frontiers were analyzed. Findings indicate that core research institutions in engineering education are predominantly concentrated in colleges of engineering and schools of engineering education. A significant proportion of highly productive authors possess interdisciplinary backgrounds in STEM fields, with U.S.-based institutions holding a significant advantage in publication volume within this field. Cluster analysis identified nine major research clusters: problem-based learning, belonging, conceptual learning, virtual laboratory, problem solving, gender, assessment tools, professional skills, and active learning. The study systematically mapped the knowledge structure and distribution of research hotspots in engineering education, drawing three key conclusions. First, The transformation of the American engineering education system exhibits correlations with its industrialization process, necessitating in-depth examination of the operational mechanisms underlying exemplary international models of engineering education. Second, the increasing number of existing studies at the epistemological and methodological levels of engineering education indicates that research on engineering education has gradually reached a systematization of research. Third, future studies should expand into the ethical, social, and socio-psychological dimensions of engineering education to advance the field. This research provides a comprehensive overview of the knowledge structure and evolving trends in engineering education research.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-13
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-14
  • 录用日期:2025-09-04
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码