新质生产力背景下科研反哺土木工程专业毕业论文教学的实践探索
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.浙江水利水电学院 建筑工程学院;2.浙江大学 建筑工程学院;3.重庆大学土木工程学院;4.利兹大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:


Practical exploration of scientific research feeding back to the teaching of graduation theses in civil engineering under the background of new quality productivity
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power;2.Zhejiang University;3.CHONGQING UNIVERSITY;4.University of Leeds

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为满足新质生产力发展对善创新会创造人才的需求,针对当前土木工程专业毕业设计选题脱离行业前沿、指导侧重流程把控、评价偏重完成度的问题,通过科研项目转化选题、师生双向互选、本-硕-博协同培养等路径,从科研思维全程渗透、实验室开放共享、创新导向评价重构三方面构建保障机制,开展了科研反哺毕业论文的教学实证研究。教学实践表明参与反哺的学生100%实现提前就业,用人单位对其创新能力满意度显著提升;考研同学实现了科研素养和学术能力的前置养成,获得导师重点培养。该探索为把“会读书的人”培养成为“会创造的人”提供了一条可行路径。

    Abstract:

    To meet the demand for innovative and creative talents in the development of new quality productive forces, and in response to the current problems of graduation design topics in civil engineering being disconnected from the industry’s cutting-edge, guidance focusing on process control, and evaluation emphasizing completion, through paths such as the transformation of research projects into topics, mutual selection between teachers and students, and collaborative training from undergraduate to postgraduate and doctoral levels, A guarantee mechanism was established from three aspects: the full-process infiltration of scientific research thinking, the open sharing of laboratories, and the reconstruction of innovation-oriented evaluation. An empirical study on the teaching of scientific research feeding back to graduation theses was carried out. Teaching practice shows that 100% of the students who participated in the feedback have achieved early employment, and the satisfaction of employers with their innovation ability has significantly increased. Students taking the postgraduate entrance examination have achieved the pre-cultivation of scientific research literacy and academic ability, and have received focused training from their supervisors. It provides a feasible path for cultivating “people who can read well” into “people who can create well”.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-05
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-18
  • 录用日期:2026-02-03
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码