数智化转型下《建设工程法规》课程的“土木-法学”融合教学模式研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

同济大学 土木工程学院结构防灾工程系

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Study on the Civil Engineering–Law Integrated Teaching Model of the “Construction Engineering Regulations” Course under Digital-Intelligent Transformation
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Civil Engineering,Tongji University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    我国土木工程领域正在经历智能化、绿色化、国际化转型,建设工程情景日益复杂,对土木工程人才的培养提出了更高要求。然而传统高等教育模式下《建设工程法规》存在教学内容滞后、教学方法单一、考核方式简单以及跨界师资不足等痛点,使得土木工程学生难以从“土木–法学”双视角剖析实际工程场景。围绕《建设工程法规》课程,提出面向土木工程–法学融合教学模式,包括构建基础型–综合型–创新型分级案例教学库,搭建包含土木工程–法学交叉知识图谱与法律文书智能分析系统的数字化平台,为课程知识组织和文本训练提供支撑。基于上述支撑,开展工程师+律师双师协同授课与模拟法庭,引导学生沉浸式参与建设工程实例分析。在课程评价方面,建立多主体、多维度评价体系,并结合模糊层次分析法确定指标权重,用于分析教学实施效果并支持课程改进。研究表明,该融合教学模式有助于提升学生在法条理解、案例分析、文本写作和情境应对等方面的综合表现,也可为工程类交叉课程教学提供参考。

    Abstract:

    China’s civil engineering sector is undergoing an intelligent, green, and international transformation, and construction engineering scenarios are becoming increasingly complex, which places higher demands on the cultivation of civil engineering talent. However, under the traditional higher education model, the course Construction Engineering Regulations still faces such problems as outdated teaching content, single teaching methods, simplistic assessment approaches, and insufficient cross–disciplinary teaching staff. As a result, civil engineering students often find it difficult to analyze real engineering scenarios from both engineering and legal perspectives. Focusing on the course Construction Engineering Regulations, this study proposes an integrated teaching model combining civil engineering and law. Specifically, a hierarchical case library composed of fundamental, comprehensive, and innovative cases is constructed, and a digital platform integrating a civil engineering–law interdisciplinary knowledge graph and an intelligent legal document analysis system is developed to support course knowledge organization and text–based training. On this basis, “engineer + lawyer” collaborative teaching and moot court activities are implemented to engage students in the analysis of construction engineering cases. In terms of course assessment, a multi–subject, multi–dimensional evaluation system is established, and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is adopted to determine indicator weights for evaluating teaching effectiveness and supporting course improvement. The results indicate that the proposed integrated teaching model can improve students’ overall performance in legal provision comprehension, case analysis, document writing, and situational response, and may also provide a useful reference for interdisciplinary teaching in engineering–related courses.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-05
  • 最后修改日期:2026-03-14
  • 录用日期:2026-04-17
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码