面向双碳的土木工程《环境与灾害》课程全寿命碳足迹教学改革
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.大连海事大学;2.大连交通大学;3.大连理工大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

大连海事大学研究生教育教学改革项目“双碳目标引领与AI技术驱动下研究《环境与灾害》课程改革与实践”。


Teaching Reform of Life-Cycle Carbon Footprint in the “Environment and Disaster” Course of Civil Engineering for Dual Carbon Goals
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Dalian Maritime University;2.Dalian Jiaotong University;3.Dalian University of Technology

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    “双碳”目标对我国土木工程人才培养提出了新的更高要求。传统土木工程《环境与灾害》课程侧重于环境影响的定性描述与灾害现象的机理分析,缺乏对工程活动环境成本的系统性量化和全寿命周期视角的评估训练,导致学生难以胜任绿色低碳建设的新需求。本研究以全寿命周期评价(LCA)方法论为核心框架,以“碳足迹”为关键量化指标,对课程实施系统性重构。通过构建“理论-技术-案例-责任”一体化教学新体系,并集成数字化分析工具,引导学生全程追踪土木工程设施从建材生产、施工建造、运营维护到拆除回收的全过程碳排放,并评估地震、洪水等灾害对碳足迹的叠加扰动效应。该改革不仅有效培养学生可持续系统思维与量化分析能力,更显著提升了其面向双碳场景的工程决策素养,为培养能够引领土木行业绿色低碳转型的创新人才提供了教学新模式。

    Abstract:

    The "Dual Carbon" goals impose new and higher demands on talent cultivation in China’s civil engineering sector. Traditional courses such as “Environment and Disaster” in civil engineering have primarily focused on qualitative descriptions of environmental impacts and mechanistic analyses of disaster phenomena, lacking systematic quantification of environmental costs from engineering activities and training in life-cycle assessment perspectives. This gap has made it difficult for students to meet the emerging requirements of green and low-carbon construction. In this study, the life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is adopted as the core framework, with “carbon footprint” as the key quantitative indicator, to systematically restructure the course. By establishing an integrated teaching system of “theory-technology-case study-responsibility” and incorporating digital analysis tools, students are guided to track the entire process of carbon emissions in civil engineering facilities-from material production and construction to operation, maintenance, demolition, and recycling-and to assess the compounding disruptive effects of disasters such as earthquakes and floods on carbon footprints. This reform not onlyeffectively cultivates students’ sustainable systemic thinking and quantitative analysis capabilities but also significantly enhances their engineering decision-making literacy in the context of dual carbon goals. It provides a new teaching model for nurturing innovative talents capable of leading the green and low-carbon transformation in the civil engineering industry.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-20
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-16
  • 录用日期:2026-04-17
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码