重庆市高等教育教学改革研究重大项目“依托建筑学特色专业建设的国际联合教学模式研究与实践”（09-1-002）
中国当前城市整体面貌不尽人意，建筑设计平庸而雷同，优秀建筑设计人才匮乏，这与芬兰这一北欧小国在现代建筑史上的成功形成了鲜明的对比。建筑教育制度的合理与否是形成这种差异的根本原因之一。文章从培养具有创新意识的优秀建筑设计人才的目标出发，总结了芬兰建筑师培养机制的优越性，同时将其与中国现行高等建筑教育制度进行了对比探讨，找出中国体制中的弊端并针对于中国建筑教育制度的改革和完善提出了一些建设性意见和建议。
Nowadays, the appearances of Chinese cities are undesirable. Most of the architecture designs are mediocre and repetition with each other. There are few excellent architects. These situations are contrasted by the success of Finland’s architecture designs. One of the fundamental reasons of the difference between China and Finland is the education system. To educate architects with original innovation capability, I summarized the superiorities of the architectural education system in Finland, compared it with that of China to find the disadvantages, and proposed suggestions to improve and renovate the higher architectural education system in China.
龙灏.芬兰高等建筑教育模式的启示[J].高等建筑教育,2009,18(5):1-6.
复制
