通识与素质教育的教学反思
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Teaching reflection of general-knowledge and quality-oriented education
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对重庆大学通识与素质教育的教学实践观察与思考发现,新生研讨课教学较为混乱,教学效度与实效不理想。学校对课程教学应予以统领性的顶层设计,一体规划教学内容的核心板块和主要环节。研讨课应围绕“大学生”、“专业学人”和“专业人”这三个核心要素来展开,引导新生从高中生向合格大学生转换,并为成为合格专业人打好基础;研讨课应围绕“研”和“讨”二字来开展教学,并以引导性阅读材料作为“研”的前提和基础,且在一定范围内组织专家统一遴选和汇编读本材料。目前,重庆大学通识与素质教育教学的整体效度与实效不佳,问题不在于“教”这一环节,而更多地存在于“学”的环节,学校应采取切实可行的措施来保障教学效度的提升和教学实效的实现。

    Abstract:

    Through long observations and careful thoughts on the teaching practice of general-knowledge and quality-oriented education in Chongqing University, it is found that the teaching in the freshman seminar is relatively in chaos and the validity and actual effect of teaching is not ideal. The course should be designed at a top level and the core plate and the main link of teaching contents should be built. The seminar should contain three key elements: “college students”, “professional learners” and “professionals”, to guide students changing from high school students to qualified college students so as to build up a firm foundation for becoming qualified professionals. The seminar teaching should combine “research” with “discuss” and provide instructive materials as the basis and prerequisite for “research”. The reading materials should be selected and collected by some experts. At present, the overall validity and the actual effect of the general-knowledge and quality-oriented education are not high in Chongqing University. This is caused by the study link instead of the teaching link. Feasible measures should be adopted to improve the teaching validity and the teaching effect.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨署东.通识与素质教育的教学反思[J].高等建筑教育,2014,23(3):5-8.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-06-17
  • 出版日期: