中国、美国和欧洲高校土木工程教学课程设置对比分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU-4

基金项目:

中国教育部"卓越工程师教育培养计划"的资助


Comparison analysis of civil engineering curriculum among universities in China, USA and Europe
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章旨在对比中国、美国及欧洲排名前列的土木工程专业高校在本科教学课程设置中的差异,统计了2014-2015年网络上公开的中国、美国和欧洲共26所排名前列的土木工程专业高校的教学计划和课程设置情况,进行了总学时数、课程结构、通识课程以及实践教学四个方面的对比分析。通过数据分析发现,中国各高校提倡文理结合的通才教育,美国各高校则相对注重通识教育课程的教学,而欧洲各高校比较重视本科阶段的专业课程教学。关于实践教学环节,中国高校主要是安排学生进行实习和课程实验,而美国和欧洲高校往往倾向于采用更加紧密的学校与企业合作办学的形式。

    Abstract:

    The purpose of this paper is to draw instructive conclusions by analyzing differences between Chinese and foreign universities on civil engineering undergraduate education. Teaching methods were taken into consideration. Statistical data for 2014-2015 years on the Internet of 26 famous universities in China, USA and Europe were collected. After comparing differences of civil engineering curriculums from selected colleges, four aspects were analyzed such as the total number of teaching hours, course structure, general education curriculum and practical teaching. It is obvious that the combination of arts and liberal education are advocated in Chinese universities, and specialized courses are taken seriously in Europe universities while general education lessons are valued in American universities. There are also many differences among universities in three regions when referring to approaches of practical teaching. Chinese universities are mainly arranged for students to take internships and curriculum experiments, while American and European universities tend to adopt more closely in the form of school and enterprise cooperation in running schools.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李林瑾,周云,曾雅丽思,张军凯.中国、美国和欧洲高校土木工程教学课程设置对比分析[J].高等建筑教育,2018,27(2):41-47.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-16
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-04-26
  • 出版日期: