竞赛作为设计课程的教学组织与调查评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU-4;G642.3

基金项目:

2019年度中国建设教育协会教育教学科研课题(2019175)


The teaching organization and investigation evaluation of competition as design course
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    各类高水平设计竞赛对建筑学本科教学有良好的促进作用,选择竞赛作为设计课程组织全体师生参加拥有诸多优势,但也存在一些难点。通过近年来组织的竞赛课程教学实践,分析了竞赛课程的优势与劣势,总结了竞赛选题、课内教学到课后延伸辅导的教学组织过程。问卷调查分析发现,学生方面对竞赛课程的评价普遍较高,多数能跟上竞赛节奏;教师方面也同样认同竞赛课程,认为原教学框架基本能适应竞赛要求。总之,竞赛作为设计课程是一项可行且有益的教学活动,还需持续地积累经验,完善教学组织管理机制。

    Abstract:

    Various high-level design competitions are very helpful to the teaching of architecture undergraduates. Choosing a competition as a design course to organize all teachers and students to participate has many advantages, but there are also some difficulties. Through the teaching practice of competition courses organized in recent years, the advantages and disadvantages of competition courses are analyzed, and the teaching organization process from competition topic selection, in-class teaching to extended after-school tutoring is summarized. Through questionnaire survey analysis, it is found that students generally positively evaluate the competition courses, most of them can keep up with the competition rhythm; teachers also agree with the competition courses and believe that the original teaching framework can basically meet the requirements of the competition. In short, competition as a design course is a feasible and beneficial teaching activity, and it is necessary to continuously accumulate experience and improve teaching organization and management mechanism.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周曦,张芳.竞赛作为设计课程的教学组织与调查评价[J].高等建筑教育,2022,31(3):172-180.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-06-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码