财经类高校工程管理专业BIM课程体系构建研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

重庆工商大学 管理科学与工程学院,重庆 400067

作者简介:

王初生(1975—),男,重庆工商大学工程管理系正高级工程师,博士,主要从事工程管理与BIM技术应用研究,(E-mail)cs_wang@126.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G642;TU17

基金项目:

重庆市教育科学“十四五”规划项目“基于BIM的工程管理专业知识碎片化与能力系统联结途径研究”(2021-GX-125)


Research on the construction of BIM curriculum system of engineering management major in finance and economics universities
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Management Science and Engineering,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    如何以新工科理念和BIM为中心再建工程管理专业培养方案,调整课程体系、教学方法、教学内容,将分散在不同课程、不同章节中的被碎片化的工程技术、管理、经济、法律等知识进行整合,培养企业与市场急需的数智化工程管理人才,成为国内外工程管理专业发展近年来研究的热点。财经类高校缺乏工程技术专业背景支撑、实践教学环节不扎实,迫切需要将BIM技术融入工程管理专业教学中。关于BIM课程开设情况、财经类高校专业教学优缺点等研究表明,财经类高校工程管理专业BIM课程体系应以有效提高工程技术理论课程教学效果、与工程经济管理核心课程充分融合、用课赛实训夯实实践教学环节为主要目标。据此,以OBE、CDIO理念为导向,提出了将理论教学、课程设计、BIM大赛实训和毕业设计融为一体的“1+3”BIM课程体系,精准构建了BIM基础理论与软件操作课程群、工程技术理论辅助课程群、工程经济管理融合课程群、综合实践应用提高课程群四大课程群,以期补齐财经类大学工程管理专业工程技术类课程短板,发挥经济管理学科优势,有效改善课程目标不明确、工程技术理论支撑不足、实践能力亟待加强、各实践教学环节缺乏系统性等问题,为财经类乃至师范、农林类高校工程管理专业BIM教学课程体系构建提供具有指导意义的思路和方法。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, it has become a hot research topic at home and abroad that how to rebuild the training scheme of engineering management specialty with the emerging engineering education concept and BIM as the center, adjust the curriculum system, teaching methods and teaching contents, and form the students’ systematic and explicit working ability with the fragmented knowledge of engineering technology, management, economy and law scattered in different courses and chapters, and cultivate the intelligent engineering management talents urgently needed by enterprises and markets. Financial and economic universities lack the background support of engineering technology and the practical teaching links are not solid, so it is urgent to integrate BIM technology into the teaching of engineering management. The setting of BIM courses in universities at home and abroad, the advantages and disadvantages of professional teaching in financial and economic universities and literature research show that the BIM course system of engineering management major in financial and economic universities should effectively improve the teaching effect of engineering technology theory courses, fully integrate with the core courses of engineering economic management, and consolidate practical teaching links with class competition training. Accordingly, guided by OBE and CDIO theories, “1+3” BIM course system is proposed, which integrates theoretical teaching, course design, BIM contest training and graduation design, and four courses groups, namely BIM basic theory and software operation course group, engineering technology theory auxiliary course group, engineering economic management integration course group and comprehensive practical application improvement course group, are accurately constructed, with a view to filling the shortcomings of engineering technology courses of engineering management major in financial universities. Give full play to the advantages of the discipline of economic management, effectively improve the situation that the course objectives are unclear, the theoretical support of engineering technology is insufficient, the practical ability needs to be strengthened, and all practical teaching links lack systematization, so as to provide guiding ideas and methods for the construction of BIM teaching curriculum system for engineering management major in finance and economics and normal agriculture and forestry universities.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王初生.财经类高校工程管理专业BIM课程体系构建研究[J].高等建筑教育,2023,32(4):120-127.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2021-09-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码