工科专业实践类课程质量标准体系研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045

作者简介:

郑妮娜(1976—),女,重庆大学土木工程学院副教授,博士,主要从事结构抗震分析与设计研究,(E-mail)zhengnina@cqu.edu.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G642.4;TB

基金项目:

重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目(233033、203203);重庆大学教学改革研究项目(2019Y2);重庆大学土木工程学院教学改革研究项目(TMJG201806)


Study on quality standard system of practice curriculum of engineering programs
Author:
Affiliation:

School of civil engineering,Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    工科专业实践类课程的质量对达成本科人才培养目标非常重要。工程教育专业认证标准对实践类课程的设置及质量提出了要求,但目前实践类课程的质量标准体系存在缺失、内容不完备或标准不统一等问题。基于工程认证对实践类课程的相关要求,结合面向产出的教育理念,分析得到影响实验类、实习类、设计类(含课程设计和毕业设计)课程质量的共性因素有教学基本条件、教学实施过程及教学效果三项,并将其作为质量标准的一级指标。在一级指标中又列出具体观测点作为二级指标,二级指标在总体一致的基础上以个别指标考虑个性因素。最后分析了基于质量标准,按照不同评价目的制定质量评价表的方法。建立的质量标准体系内容全面、指标统一,便于进行横向比较,可促进实践类课程质量的监控和持续改进。

    Abstract:

    The quality of practice curriculum is important for achieving the goal of talents cultivation in engineering programs. There are some requirements for practice curriculum in engineering accreditation standard. But current situation is that: some universities have not quality standard system for practice curriculum, or the main requirements of engineering accreditation standard are not included, or the contents of quality standard are inconsistent with different kinds of practice curriculum. Based on the requirements for practice curriculum in engineering accreditation standard, considering the idea of outcome based education, the common three influence factors, which affecting and reflecting the quality of experiment course, practice course and design course(including course design and graduation design(thesis)) , are summarized as the fundamental elements, the teaching process and the teaching effects, and set as the first level quality indicators. The specific influence factors are investigated as the second level quality indicators, most of them are same, some are different according to the particular characteristic. Finally, the method of how to build the quality evaluation form according to different evaluation purpose are put forward. The contents of quality standard system are comprehensive and the quality indicator are consistent with each other, which is convenient for horizontal comparison and can promote the quality control and continuous improvement of practical courses.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郑妮娜,谢强,王志军,卢黎.工科专业实践类课程质量标准体系研究[J].高等建筑教育,2024,33(3):74-80.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2022-12-26
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-05-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码