以复杂工程问题解决能力为导向的课程建设研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

天津理工大学 管理学院,天津 300384

作者简介:

尹贻林,男,教授,经济学博士,国家级教学名师,主要从事公共项目治理与工程造价管理,(E-mail)2055706540@qq.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G642

基金项目:


Research on curriculum construction oriented to solving complex engineering problems
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, P. R. China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以复杂工程问题的内涵为抓手,基于复杂工程问题跨学科性、综合性强等特点,探讨解决复杂工程问题须具备的能力要素,从技术能力和非技术能力两个维度进行解构。技术能力意味着解决复杂工程问题必须具备相应的工程知识应用能力和拓展能力,具备复杂性动态变化下与之相适应的问题分析能力、研究能力和使用现代工具的能力;非技术能力则要求解决复杂工程问题应具备良好的沟通表达能力、组织协调能力、团队协作能力和符合时代要求的工程伦理观。基于此,从课程教学团队建设、课程规划建设、评价机制建设三个方面入手构建课程体系。课程教学团队建设要求教师必须树立“以教为本、以学生为中心”的教育理念,既要教会学生运用工程知识的技术本领,又要基于学生角度培养其非技术能力;课程规划建设强调课程设置应以复杂工程问题解决能力为导向,细化其能力指标进而设置相应的理论课程及实践课程,融合多元化教学方法有所侧重地培养学生解决复杂工程问题所需的技术能力和非技术能力;评价机制作为实现持续改进的必要手段,应综合考评学生的技术能力和非技术能力,以适应复杂工程问题解决能力评价需求。最后运用案例分析法以天津理工大学工程造价专业实践为例进行阐释,分析其以复杂工程问题解决能力为导向的课程设置情况及实践成效,旨在为地方应用型大学培养学生复杂工程问题解决能力提供借鉴。

    Abstract:

    This study takes the connotation of complex engineering problems as the starting point, discusses the ability elements needed to solve complex engineering problems based on the characteristics of complex engineering problems such as interdisciplinarity and comprehensiveness, and deconstructs the ability to solve complex engineering problems from the two dimensions of technical ability and non-technical ability. Technical ability means that to solve complex engineering problems must have the corresponding engineering knowledge application ability and expansion ability, as well as the ability to analyze problems, research and use modern tools under the dynamic change of complexity. Non-technical ability requires good communication and expression ability, organization and coordination ability, teamwork ability and engineering ethics in line with the requirements of the times to solve complex engineering problems. In view of this, a curriculum system is constructed from three aspects: the curriculum teaching team, the curriculum planning and the evaluation mechanism. The construction of the curriculum teaching team requires teachers to establish the teacher-centered education concept and the student-centered teaching principle. We should not only teach students the ability to use engineering knowledge, but also cultivate their non-technical ability from the perspective of students. Curriculum planning construction emphasizes that the curriculum should be oriented to the ability to solve complex engineering problems, refine its ability index and set up corresponding theoretical and practical courses, and integrate diversified teaching methods to focus on cultivating students’ technical ability and non-technical ability to solve complex engineering problems. As a necessary means to achieve continuous improvement, the evaluation mechanism should comprehensively evaluate students’ technical ability and non-technical ability, and adapt to the evaluation demand of complex engineering problem solving ability. Finally, this study uses case analysis method to explain the practical case of the engineering cost major at Tianjin University of Technology, and analyzes its complex engineering problem solving ability-oriented curriculum and practical results, aiming to provide reference for local application-oriented universities to cultivate complex engineering problem solving ability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

尹贻林,孙肖肖,邓娇娇,严玲,柯洪.以复杂工程问题解决能力为导向的课程建设研究[J].高等建筑教育,2026,35(1):162-171.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2022-10-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码